In article <20020725155113.09099.00000672@mb-ch.aol.com>, Michael J. Mahon wrote: >If the presence of a non-standard number of 0 bits were not detectable >by a Disk ][ controller, this so-called "bit stuffing" scheme could not >be verified to be present, negating its usefulness as a disk "signature" >technique. There's a couple of common things that were done without trying to verify the non-standard self-sync bits directly, such as sticking in some non-self-sync FFs where there would normally be self-sync FFs. If you do it right, you can make a normal "nybble copy" (which will assume they are all self sync) write too many bits and corrupt the disk, or at least shrink one of the gaps to a detectably smaller length. -- Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net ===== Every time you buy a CD, a programmer is kicked in the teeth. Every time you buy or rent a DVD, a programmer is kicked where it counts. Every time they kick a programmer, 1000 users are kicked too, and harder. A proposed US law called the CBDTPA would ban the PC as we know it. This is not a joke, not an exaggeration. This is real. http://www.cryptome.org/broadbandits.htm