DEADLINE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE Official Memo Lakeville, CT Police Department ------------------------------- File # H657/SJ43.1 G.K. Anderson, Detective 1st Class July 8, 1982 RE: Robner Case Although it appears that at least one member of the Robner houshold had a reason for wishing Mr. Robner dead, the findings of the Medical Examiner and evidence gained from interviews with the family and family associates are only consistent with the conclusion that Mr. Robner died of a self-administered overdose of Ebullion. G.K. Anderson LAB REPORT Case: Robner, Marshall File #: H657/SJ43.1 Officer of Record: Detective G.K. Anderson ------------------------------------------ Mat'l(s) analyzed: Porcelain teacup Analyzed for: fingerprints, foreign substances Date: 7/8/82 Laboratory findings: The teacup was analyzed. The cup contained tea only. No trace of Ebullion or other substances was found. Fingerprints on the cup belonged to the deceased and Ms. Dunbar. Summary of Findings from Coroner's Examination Name: Robner, Marshall File #: H65 7/SJ43.1 Date: 7/8/82 Sex: Male Race: Caucasian Eyes:Brown Hair: Gray Ht: 5'11 Wt: 192 lbs. Distinguishing marks: none Apparent cause of death: Drug overdose (Ebullion) ----------------------------------------------------------- There were no injuries or marks of a suspicious nature, except a small bruise on the left temple (consistent with falling to the floor from a chair). Analysis of the blood of the deceased revealed a blood level of 27mg% for Ebullion. The therapeutic range of this drug is normally 4 to 6mg%. A fatal dose, while not specifies by the manufacturer, had been found to be in the 10-20mg% range. A routine analysis for other drugs was unproductive. Findings were unremarkable except for the massive liver damage consistent with overdose of Ebullion, and 10mg of Ebullion recovered from the stomach. Death occured at 1 AM, plus or minus one hour. The blood level of Ebullion and the massive liver damage consistent with Ebullion toxicity lead to the inevitable conclusion that the deceased died of an overdose of that drug. Xaviera Hockmuller M.D. July 9, 1982 Chief of Detectives Edindale Police Department Edindale, CT 06103 Dear Chief: I must once again ask for your assistance on a case of one of my clients. As you are no doubt aware, Mr. Marshall Robner, the industrialist and philanthropist, was found dead yesterday morning in his home. As far as I can determine, he was found dead on the floor of his library, the victim of an overdose of Ebullion, a medicine which he had been taking lately for severe bouts of depression. He had been alone during the night, and the door to his library had been bolted from the inside. Police had to break the door down with axes, I'm told, to get inside. While I am completely convinced that there was no foul play involved on Mr. Robner's death, it is disturbing that Mr. Robner had called me only three days earlier for the purpose of informing me that his will was to be altered. In fact, I was expecting to hear from him this week so that he could deliver the papers to me. Given the size of the Robner estate, I feel that a more complete investigation should be undertaken, if for no other reason than to quash the suspicions which are inevitable in these circumstances. I have sifted through the evidence gathered by the local police authorites and am passing it along for your inspection. I phoned Mrs. Robner this morning and informed her of my intention of having you take the case. She was reluctant to be of assistance, but I convinced her to allow you to come around at eight o'clock tomorrow morning and spend the day. I will be at the house at noon tomorrow for the reading of the current will, which Mr. Robner wrote a few years ago. I hope to see you then. Sincerely yours, Warren Coates Excerpts from Interview with Mrs. Robner Detective Anderson: How did you come to find Mr. Robner? Mrs. Robner: When I woke up this morning, I noticed that Marshall was not in bed. I wasn't alarmed, really, as it was not unusual for him to work late at night in the library and fall asleep there. I went down the hall to the library and knocked on the door. He didn't answer, so I knocked even harder. When that didn't work, I started calling his name loudly. So loud, actually, that I woke up Ms. Dunbar and George. We all were gathered there, knocking and yelling, and finally Mrs. Rourke, our housekeeper, was alarmed enough to come upstairs. She suggested calling the police, which we did. They arrived about twenty minutes later, and started breaking down the door with axes. When we entered the room, we found Marshall lying on the floor, face down. Anderson: Did he usually keep his door locked when he worked? Robner: Almost always. He was pretty secretive about his work, and he liked to be alone when he worked. Anderson: Do you know of any reason why your husband might have wanted to take his own life? Robner: He's been very depressed lately, you know. His business, Robner Corporation, is not doing well, and there is talk of selling out to a larger firm. Marshall founded the company, what, about twenty six years ago, and he has been desparately trying to find some way of saving it. Anderson: The pills we found by his body, do you know what they are? Robner: Yes. They were Ebullion tablets. It's an anti-depressent his doctor prescribed for him just last week. Anderson: Had he been acting less depressed since then? Robner: I really don't know. I haven't noticed much change. Anderson: Did your husband ever talk of suicide? Robner: He did, actually, though I never took it seriously. He would talk about how everything would be easier if he were dead, but then he would start again talking about how he was going to have to keep the business going. I'm ... I'm stunned, really. Anderson: Mrs. Robner, do you know of anyone who might have wanted to kill your husband? Robner: Why, no. Of course not. He wasn't a very friendy man, he was very quiet. But he was a great philanthropist, you know, and everyone that knew him respected him. I can't imagine anyone wanting to hurt Marshall. Do you really suspect he didn't commit suicide? Anderson: I don't suspect anything. I just want to understand what's happened. Excerpts From Interview with Ms. Dunbar Detective Anderson: You were Mr. Robner's personal secretary, is that right? Ms. Dunbar: Yes, sir. Anderson: I understand that you were the last person to see Mr. Robner alive. Could you tell me about that? Dunbar: Why, yes. I brought him some tea at about 11 PM that night. On nights when he expected to work late, he would always expect tea at that hour. I brought him the tea and he asked me to leave. That's all. Anderson: Did Mr. Robner seem at all up set? Dunbar: He did appear quite nervous, but he had been upset for some time, as you know. Anderson: Do you know what he was working on that evening? Dunbar: No. I wasn't with him, except for that one time. Anderson: Do you recall whether the pills, the Ebullion pills, were on the desk when you came in? Dunbar: No, I don't remember that. Anderson: Ms. Dunbar, were you with Mrs. Robner when the door was opened by the police? Dunbar: Yes. Anderson: Do you remember her reaction? Anything she might have said? Dunbar: She didn't really react much. I don't think she said anything except "He's dead." or something of that sort. She just stood there with the rest of us until you people arrived. Anderson: How were the Robners getting along? I mean, were they happily married? Dunbar: I don't think so, really. He was so quiet and, well, dreamy. She was always scolding him for paying too much attention to the business and to his "good works". They rarely went out lately, which seemed to upset Mrs. Robner quite a bit. She had friends of her own that she used to visit. I think she would have gone insane, otherwise. Anderson: Thakn you, Ms Dunbar. Oh, one last thing. You prepared the tea for Mr. Robner? Dunbar: Yes, I started the water boiling about quarter of, and then poured the tea when I heard the whistle from the living room. Anderson: You weren't in the kitchen during that time? Dunbar: I just told you, no. Anderson: Was anyone else awake in the house while you were waiting? Dunbar: Yes, I believe that both George and Mrs. Robner were awake. I remember George coming down, reading for a bit, the retiring. Anderson: Do you believe anyone might have a reason to kill Mr. Robner? Dunbar: No, I can't imagine it. Anderson: Thank you, Ms. Dunbar. Oh, Ms. Dunbar, were you at home all night, last night I mean? Dunbar: Well, no, actually. I was out with a friend last night and we didn't get back until abvout 10:30 or thereabouts. Anderson: Thanks again, Ms. Dunbar. Excerpts From Interview with Mr. Baxter Detective Anderson: You were Mr. Robner's Business partner, is that correct? Baxter: That's right. Anderson: How long have you and Mr. Robner been partners? Baxter: For about twenty five years now. I was his partner almost from the start of the business. Anderson: Mrs. Robner tells me that there have been problems lately with the business. Could you tell me what that's all about? Baxter: Yes, the business has it's problems, some of them quite large. Marshall and I were working on a plan to solve those problems and get the company back on its feet again before we would be forced to take drastic action. I hope that I can hold things together now that Marshall is dead. He was the founder of the business and controlled many things by himself. Andeson: Did Mr. Robner ever talk to you about personal problems, or how he felt? Baxter: No, we were business partners, not intimate friends. I don't think he really had any close friends. I know he had gotten himself very upset about the business, but that's the extent of it. Anderson: When was the last time you saw Mr. Robner? Baxter: Yesterday afternoon, at the office in town. Anderson: And where were you after work? Baxter: Last night was my concert night at the Hartford Symphony. I go there quite regularly. After the concert, at about 10 o'clock, I went home. I received a call from Mrs. Robner this morning telling me of the tragedy, and I arrived here just a few minutes ago. Anderson: Were you at the concert alone? Baxter: Quite alone. Anderson: Do you know of anyone who might have wanted to harm Mr. Robner? Baxter: No. Except for George, of course. During some of their shouting matches Iv'e heard George threaten Marshall, but I don't think he ever would have followed through. Anderson: Shouting matches? Baxter: George and Marshall were always at odds. You see, George has been living like a spoiled child all his life. He's twenty five now and has never held a job. Just spends money, or gambles it away. Being the Robner's only child, he gets away with murder. Marshall would lecture him and threaten to cut him off without a cent, and then the yelling would start. Eventually Marshall would give in. Anderson: When was the last time you heard this? Baxter: Actually, I heard it again just last week. Strange, now that I think of it, they went at it just last week. I hear that Marshall told George that he had decided to disinherit him. He even mentioned it to me at the office the next day. He seemed pretty serious. I suppose that the financial troubles at the company may have been responsible for his attitude. Anderson: Are you at the house often? You say you have heard some of these 'shouting matches'. Baxter: Well, I'm really not here often. Only on occasion. I have heard it once or twice and have been told of other times. Anderson: Thank you, Mr. Baxter. Excerpts From Interview with George Robner Detective Anderson: Mr. Robner, I have been told by Mr. Baxter that you and your father had some serious arguments lately. Could you tell me what they were about? George Robner: I don't think that's your business. Anderson: I'm told they had to do with your habit of wasting or gambling away your father's money. Robner: So? Anderson: I've even been told that he threatened to disinherit you. Robner: Yeah. He said he was going to. I'll bet he didn't, though. He never has. Anderson: Mr. Robner, let me be frank. I'm told that you threatened violence against your father as recently as a week ago, and now he's dead. Robner: Look, I don't get what your driving at. You find the poor guy dead in his room. The room is locked. His bottle of medicine is nearly empty. What sort of detective are you, anyway? Anderson: I'm doing the asking if you don't mind. Robner: Then ask someone else. Note: G.R. left abruptly at this point. Excerpts from Interview with Mrs. Rourke Anderson: Mrs. Rourke, how long have you been working as housekeeper for the Robners? Rourke: Ever since the house was built, six years ago. Anderson: Tell me all you remember from the night of the murder. Rourke: I remember that by about 10:30 or so ... Anderson: You mean 10:30 PM. Rourke: Yes. By 10:30 when I went to my room to do some reading, everyone was upstairs excepting Ms. Dunbar, who had just returned home. She went upstairs at about 11 bringing Mr. Robner his tea. He almost always takes his tea at 11. I remember saying goodnight to her on her way up, and that's the last I heard until this morning, with all the shouting and banging going on upstairs. No, that isn't right. George was downstairs also for a while, only about 10 minutes or so. Anderson: Could someone have gone upstairs during the night? Rourke: I don't rightly think so, at least no before 3 or 4. You see, I like to do some reading late at night, and I was reading this really exciting mystery story, and, lord, I was up until nearly 4 o'clock before I finished. And who do you think the murderer was? Anderson: Really, Mrs. Rourke, let's stick to the matter at hand. Do you keep the door closed at night when you are reading? Rourke: Yes, sir. Anderson: So then it's possible that someone might have entered the house and gone upstairs without your knowledge. Rourke: No, sir. I don't believe so. Why don't you try the stairs yourself? For a new house, these stairs are the noisiest I've ever heard. My door's right beside it, too. When the Robners owned a little cat, I can remember hearing every footstep creaking up the stairs. Don't know why they don't ever fix it up. I guess it don't bother them any. Anderson: But it is possible that someone might have entered after you went off to sleep. Rourke: Well, I suppose it might be, but not before. Anderson: How long has Ms. Dunbar been living here? Rourke: Ever since the place was built. She does an awful lot of work for Mr. Robner, you know. I don't think he could have gotten along without her, although that's not my business to say. He was always so nervous, fretting about everything, and forgetting to do this and that. It seemed that she was always covering his tracks, if you get my meaning. Anderson: Do you have any reason to suspect anyone of wanting to harm Mr. Robner? Rourke: Well, of course I've heard all of the screaming and fussing with George and Mr. Robner. That's been going on for years, now, so I don't make much of it anymore. No, I can't imagine anyone wanting to hurt poor Mr. Robner. He was such a sweet man. Anderson: Thank you, Mrs. Rourke. INSTRUCTIONS The Time Element It is usually necessary to conduct your investigation as expeditiously as possible. In this case you have an absolute deadline of 12 hours, by which you must have the case fully concluded. It is therefore of the utmost importance that you make proper use of your time. Most actions that you perform will take about one minute of investigative time. Some actions, such as examinations done CAREFULLY, may take a bit longer. If you wish to cause time to pass without actually doing anything, you can say WAIT FOR some number of MINUTES. Alternatively, you can WAIT FOR some person, or WAIT UNTIL a specified time. In any case, you will see events occuring while you are waiting, and always have the opportunity to change your mind about sitting idly should an interesting event take place. Evidence During your investigation, you will uncover pieces of physical evidence found in your vicinity. While this evidence may be vital in itself to reach a proper conclusion to the case, it may also be of great interest to one of the principals in the case. Therefore, showing pieces of evidence to others (even suspects) may have a useful effect. Other people may make discoveries of their own which they may relate to you. It is altogether proper to ask to be shown such findings. Suspects It is possible to ask people for information. However, be aware that their answers, while often helpful, may be self-serving, false, or contradictory. Remember at all times that you are dealing with people- some of whom are under great pressure or emotional strain. The most extreme care must be exercised when you ACCUSE people. The Police Laboratory The facilities of the nearby police laboratory are always available to you. Fingerprints found on objects can be compared with those of the principals, which are on file at the lab, simply by instructing the lab to FINGERPRINT the object in question. You can ANALYZE an object in a routine manner or FOR a specific substance. Sergeant Duffy, as diligent an assistant as can be found in the annals of criminology, will take objects to the lab for you and return with the results, usually within half an hour. Procedure for Making Arrests When you feel that you have established a convincing case against one or more people, you may decide to ARREST them. (A single individual must be in your presence to be arrested; two or more accomplices need not be.) After some soul searching, you may realize that you haven't nearly enough evidence to substantiate the charge, and may hold off at the last moment. Otherwise, Sergeant Duffy will arrive with the handcuffs and take the accused into custody. Your role in the case will then be concluded, and you will receive a letter from your superiors indicating the outcome of the grand jury investigation, and if all goes well at that level, the trial itself. Should the grand jury fail to indict or the trial jury fail to convict, your superiors will try to indicate the reasons for the failure of the state's case. (Since guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, it is important to demonstrate the three crucial elements: means, motives and opportunities.) But take heart from any failures you may have--the sleuth who learns from his mistakes will sleuth all the more effectively his next time n the trail. There are many possible endings to your case, each determined by your handling of the case and the conclusions you draw from the evidence you gather. But just as there exists the perfect crime, there is also the perfect solution to a crime. With skill and dedication, you will no doubt succeed. Strategies for Novices Many detectives start an investigation by "casing" the sceneof the crime. This facilitates movement as the case proceeds. In this regard, it is useful to draw a map or blueprint indicating the directions of travel between various places in the area. It is especially important to examine potentially important pieces of evidence. Be liberal in the use of the police laboratory in FINGERPRINTing or ANALYZEing evidence. Note carefully the laboratory's findings. Ask people questions about the crime itself, other people involved in the case, or unusual words which may turn up on evidence or in conversation. Often, this will uncover contradictions or lead to new evidence. Pay attention when people's behavior changes. It may be that they have learned something that will effect their actions. FOLLOWing them may be helpful, but often it is better to observe at a safe distance. Show relevant evidence to interested persons. They may learn something which could cause them to react in a helpful manner. If another person has found something, ask to see it. Although care should be taken in making accusations, especially without sufficient evidence, a timely accusation can lead the presumed criminal to make careless mistakes. Doing the Legwork To walk from place to place, say WALK and the direction in which you wish to proceed. There are ten possible directions: NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST, NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST, SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST, UP, and DOWN. Each of these directions can be abbreviated to one or two letters (e.g., N, SE, D). When you enter a particular place for the first time, survey it in detail. Note its name (e.g., the living room), its layout, and all objects located there which might be of interest. Whenever you return, you will instantly recall the name of the place and your eye will catch and significant object. In order to examine the place more fully, you have only to say LOOK AROUND (or something similar). Handling Evidence To handle any of the various pieces of evidence, simply refer to the object by its name. Should there be several objects of the same type (e.g., two tables), just add a descriptive word (e.g., THE LONG TABLE). Here are some ways in which other investigators have handled evidence: TAKE THE PENCIL. PUT DOWN THE CUP OF COFFEE. SIT DOWN ON THE SOFA. EXAMINE THE DETECTIVE MAGAZINE. LOOK BEHIND THE PAINTING. SEARCH NEAR THE SCUFF MARKS. TAKE EVERYTHING EXCEPT THE FISH BOWL AND THE ANTIQUE ROCKING CHAIR. Don't hesitate to handle more than one object at a time. Just be sure to separate their names by a comma of the word AND: PUT THE WRAPPER, THE TICKET, AND THE NAIL FILE ON THE DRESSER. Dealing with Suspects and Other People The best authorities recommend courtesy as a key to winning the confidence of those you encounter while conducting police business. For instance, speaking to people from a distance is strongly discouraged. If you need to get the attention of someone who is, say, down a hall or corridor, simply remark, MRS. JONES! If you cannot resist the urge, you may even say HEY, MRS. JONES! Once you and another person are in the same place, you can ask questions or ask that person to do something for you. However, there are only two types of questions that will be answered: those dealing with information about someone or something, and those concerning the whereabouts of persons and objects. Again, courtesy is the key. When addressing someone, precede your statement or question with that person's name and a comma: MR. JONES, TELL ME ABOUT MRS. JONES. JIM, WHO IS THE BUTLER? SALLY, HAVE YOU SEEN MR. BRADY? FRED, SHOW ME THE BULLET HOLES. MR. GILES, GIVE ME THE GUN. Once you are engaged in conversation with someone, you can skip the formality and simply state requests. However, when you or the person with whom you are speaking moves to a different place, it is proper to re-initiate your interview by using the individual's name. Avoiding Tedious Interrogations It is considered extremely poor to ask interrogees questions which have already been asked by other police officials. Therefore, you are supplied with any relevant interviews obtained from other police officials. Also, as noted in the preceeding section, only a few types of questions will receive a response. When it is impossible to elicit a response to a question that seems vital to your investigation. the needed information will often be found in your dossier. If not, you can assume the information is not inportant. Communicating Your Intent Clarity of speech is as important as clarity of mind in detective work. At times, you may happen to specify an action incompletely. For example, you might say KILL THE SUSPECT without indicating the weapon you wish to utilize. In such cases, you may be asked to make a clarification (e.g., WITH WHAT?). Should this occur, just answer the question (e.g., WITH THE REVOLVER). If you specify an action incompletely in a situation where one thing may be assumed (e.g., there is only one weapon), you will be informed of that assumption (e.g., WITH THE REVOLVER). If you say something which cannot be understood because it is either too complex or improperly stated, you will be told of the problem. Flatfoot Computer Lingo The police department has only limited resources and its computers often use words which they cannot understand. Such words are used only to enhance your imagery and focus your deductive powers. Ending an Investigation If you wish to terminate your investigation and not come back to it at a later time, you can type QUIT. Since a decision of this kind is irreversible, you will have to confirm your decision. If you want to terminate your investigation by starting over from scratch (an actual example of something impossible prior to the advent of computers), you can type RESTART. You will again be asked to confirm your decision. Continuing an Investigation at a Later Time Another advance in the science of detection is the ability to susoend your investigation midway and continue it from that point at a later time. This is similar to placing a bookmark in the book you're reading to continue at another sitting. To suspend your investigation type SAVE and answer the questions as described on your Reference Card. To return to your investigation at another time, type RESTORE and answer the questions as described in the Reference Card. You may want to use this feature when you are about to try something dangerous or irrevocable. Utilizing Stenographic Services Depending on your hardware, you may be able to obtain a typed transcript of your activities using the SCRIPT command. The transcript may be stopped with the UNSCRIPT command. Consult your Reference Card for the availability of this service on your system. COMMON TERMS IN INVESTIGATIONS ACCUSE (someone) OF (something) Makes an accusation against someone. (In this regard, "something" is usually murder.) AGAIN Causes the last action you performed to be repeated. ANALYZE (something) Asks the police laboratory to perform a routine analysis (including fingerprint comparisons) of something. ANALYZE (something) FOR (something specific) Asks the police laboratory to analyze something specifically for something in particular ARREST (someone or someones) If there is a conisderable amount of evidence against an individual or individuals, this command ends the case and describes the result of the prosecution. ASK (someone) ABOUT (something or someone) An impersonal form of the expression "(Someone), TELL ME ABOUT (something or someone)," it can be used as an abbreviated form of questioning. BRIEF Causes a place to be described completely only on your first visit there, On subsequent visits, only the name of the place and the important objects present there will be described. (This is the normal situation.) EXAMINE (somthing) Looks at something with an eye toward detail. FINGERPRINT (something) Asks the police laboratory to compare fingerprints on (something) with those on file at the lab. FOLLOW (someone) Does the obvious. INVENTORY Lists your possessions. This can be abreviated to I. LOOK AROUND Provides a complete description of your surroundings. This can be abbreviated to either LOOK or L. QUIT If confirmed, terminates the investigation. If you wish to continue the investigation at a later time, use the SAVE command first. RESTART If confirmed, terminates the investigation and starts over from the beginning. RESTORE Restores a previously suspended investigation. SAVE Suspends your investigation for completion at a later time. SCRIPT Starts a transcript (if you have a printer). SEARCH (something or someone) Does the obvious. SEARCH NEAR (something) Looks closely at the area immediate to something, possibly providing more information than simply examining it. SHOW ME (something) A request to another person to show or lead you to something. SHOW (something) TO (someone) Does the obvious, possibly eliciting and interesting reaction. TIME Displays the current time. THis can be abbreviated to T. UNSCRIPT Stops a transcript that started using the SCRIPT command. VERBOSE Causes a complete description of a place to be displayed every time you enter that place. VERSION Displays the version and serial number of your copy of DEADLINE. WAIT FOR (number) MINUTES Causes time to pass without your taking any particular action. If anything interesting happens during this time, you will have the opportunity to stop waiting. WAIT FOR (someone) Causes time to pass until someone arrives at the place you are in. Every so often you will have the opportunity to stop waiting for that person is he/she hasn't yet arrived. WAIT UNTIL (time) Causes time to pass until the desired time arrives. As with the other WAIT commands, interesting events happening in your environs will give you th option of terminating your idle state. WHATS WRONG A request to another person to discuss what's on his mind. WHERE IS (something or someone) A request to another person to help you find something or someone. WHO IS HERE Describes other people who are in the same place that you are. This is done implicitly during a LOOK AROUND.